Bitin Back The Use of Irony

Animal Farm compared to the Russian Revolution Essays - Free Essays

Animal Farm compared to the Russian Revolution Essays - Free Essays Animal Farm compared to the Russian Revolution Animal Farm by George Orwell Animal Farm compared to the Russian Revolution All of the characters in Animal farm have counterparts in real life. This book was based on the Russian Revolution, and all the important populace of the revolution are symbolized. Some of the animals represent individuals in the Russian Revolution, and some types of animals represent different types of Russian citizens. The book carries out much like the actual revolution. It starts out with hopes of an empire where all are equal and the unfair unjust leader is thrown out. Then it moves on to where some individuals begin to take more power than is rightfully theirs. At the end the rulers have completely taken over and the kingdom is as it was under the original rulers. I will compare the animals from top of the social class to the bottom. At the top were the pigs. Each pig represented someone different in the revolution. Old Major is compared to Lenin. He was an ideologist who dreamed up a wonderful government where all the animals were equal and the humans, or the czars, were pushed out. Unfortunately his dream would never materialize. Then we are left with his predecessors. The first is Snowball. Snowball believed one hundred percent in Old Majors ideals. He wanted all the things Old Major wanted, such as the welfare of the animals. In the Russian Revolution his counterpart would be Trotsky. Trotsky believed and wanted the same things as Lenin, and wanted to continue what Lenin had started. Then comes Napoleon. Napoleon was selfish and greedy. He did not want to share the power or the decision making with any other individual. This was the same for Stalin. At first Napoleon and Snowball shared the decision making and had debates about what course of action they would take. This worked for awhile. Then Napoleon grew weary of long debates, and he thought he could make the decision by himself. He then forced Snowball out of the farm and started to spread lies about Snowball to get the entire farm against him. Stalin did the same thing against Trotsky and forced Trotsky into hiding into Mexico, where he was eventually assassinated. Both Stalin and Napoleon ruined any hopes of equal and fare government and instead set up dictatorships. Then comes the final important pig, Squealer. Squealer did not make the decisions in the government but acted more like the controlled media as in the Russian government. His job was to influence the people by exaggerating and re-writing history and sometimes telling plain lies all together. The people would listen to him, and he would always listen to Napoleon. Other animals were the worker class type citizens. The types of citizens range from hard working to selfish and lazy. Molly, for instance, only cared about her ribbons, and wasnt much of a thinker. All she wanted to do was eat sugar, and look pretty. Benjamin was a critic who always said Ive seen that before and Itll never work. The cat was just plain lazy, and was always disappearing whenever work had to be done. The ducks were weak and did not get much done. Then there were other donkeys which worked much harder and never thought of their own needs. The pigeons acted as message carriers spreading propaganda between farms, spreading Napoleons words from farm to farm, or in the actual Russian Revolution, country to country. Although all these animals are very different, they all shared one common trait. They were all weak. They all let Napoleon take over without much resistance. Just like Stalin took over Russia. These animals were too weak, too scared, or just lacked the intelligence required to do something about it. This is where it is the fault of the people. They should have stood up to Napoleon for what they fought for in the first place. The people must stand up to those who would destroy the system or else all is lost. I think that this story was a good representation of the actual Russian Revolution. But it is even more than that. It shows how people can let certain individuals get away with

Gender Relations, in Relation to Violence and Misogyny Essay

Gender Relations, in Relation to Violence and Misogyny - Essay Example At times their music has been inspired by the experiences they have had with the opposite sex, observations they have made in the environment or general attitudes that they hold towards the gender. These opinions are demonstrated in the writer’s choice of words, the facial and physical signs and the dancing art accompanying the songs. Misogyny is also expressed in many of songs written by these writers. Misogyny refers to hatred for women usually exposed by men. A significant number of songs written by men tend to carry this theme (Sellnow 34). They tend express hatred towards the opinion of women while others of express hatred towards the physical appearance some women. In this state women are seen as objects for men’s utilization. Songs that purports gender violence have been designed to communicate that women should be submissive to their men giving the man power over the women. In this situation exploitation is not only expected but should also be demanded. The mess ages included in the songs include, abuse and torture, rape, and fostering an acceptable sexual objectification towards women. These themes are not only an issue of violence but also misogyny (Campbell 518). This has led to participants also obtaining a negative attitude towards women and therefore enhancing gender violence and misogamy. Misogyny is a situation where there exists a feeling of hatred towards female gender in the society. This happens especially where there is women subordination, inequality and gender discrimination. Misogyny usually has an impact on the gender relations especially between men and women. In the music industry, men, who are viewed as rational beings, tend to express their attitude towards women through songs. These songs consist of... This paper stresses that most of the song writers writing about relationship from the perspective of love tend to portray an emotional attachment that exists between the genders in terms of love. They tend to communicate that both genders will have a beautiful life if they existed together in love and care for each other. Many songwriters have also written songs that express violence that exist between men and women in the society. Song writers who express this theme of violence express the turbulent nature of relationship that exists between men and women. This report makes a conclusion that it is true that music is a very effective tool of communication used to transmit information from one person to another. Its effectiveness can be explained by its popularity and persuasiveness. All the same, its effectiveness can be a tool of destruction in the community if its content is not checked. Music is a main source of disregard to women arising form songs that have been written by their male counterparts. Music by several musicians such as Eminem, Kanye west and Flo Rida is evidence to violence to women by men in the music industry. Women are portrayed as a weaker sex, which is dependant on men, immoral, and should be an object to man’s desires. More to this, women are shown to lack authority to make major decisions and can only use their appearance to seduce men into something. When women dance in the videos naked they are demonstrated as sexual objects whose worth can only be judged from their appearance. This information when sen t to the public is very destructive leading to gender violence and misogyny.